pastor plus

fugitive with a midnight mission; evolving minister; expectedly subversive; finally comes the poet

Saturday, May 13, 2006

木棉花

酷熱日子之中,忽然刮一日大風。教會附近一條街道,滿天都是被大風吹起的木棉花,而且撲面而來。

媽媽問我:「為何這麼多木棉花?」


我嘗試先提供一個最簡短的答案:「因為這裏有一棵棉樹。」

想不到媽媽很滿意這個答案,她像想起甚麼似的說了一句:「是的,這裏有一梱木棉樹。以前跟你爸爸往那邊乘搭巴士的時候,就見過一棵木棉樹。」

今日我與母親走進漫天飛舞的木棉花之中,我們很融洽,最叫我感動的,是木棉花送給我們一點回憶。

這個母親節,我時常想著的,是離世的父親。

Thursday, May 11, 2006

是Jesus,不是Snoopy


我們知道耶穌基督升天,但甚少反醒基督升天的意義,我好像從未聽過這方面的講壇訊息。

五月二十八日我們是升天主日,是這幾年內,也可能是教會歷來第一次的升天主日。

我先向兩歲的小兒講解基督升天的情況,我很高興他有愉快的體會。

小兒早前已熟悉主耶穌復活的故事,昨日我拿著耶穌布公仔向他解說耶穌基督升天。我將公仔從地上慢慢舉起,而且越舉越高,逗得小兒笑呵呵。


他隨即舉起史諾比公仔,我說是「Jesus 升天,是Jesus」,「不是Snoopy」,他就更加高舉史諾比,而且笑得更開心。

這是小兒第一次關於基督升天的學習。小兒大概仍然無法明白升天,這本來是一個超越我們領域的課題。

魯益師 1942 一篇訊息這樣描述升天:

If anything is clear from the records of Our Lord's appearances after His resurrection, it is that the risen body was very different from the body that died and that it lives under conditions quite unlike those of natural life......yet He emphatically insists that He is not merely a spirit and takes steps to demonstrate that the risen body can still perform animal operations, such as eating. What makes all this baffling to us is our assumption that to pass beyond what we call nature----beyond the three dimensions and the five highly specialized and limited senses----is immediately to be in a world of pure negative spiritually, a world where space of any sort and sense of any sort have no function. I know no ground for believing this......There may be natures piled upon natures, each supernatural to the one beneath it, before we come to the abyss of pure spirit; and to be in that abyss, at the right hand of thte Father, may not mean being absent from any of these natures----may mean a yet more dynamic presence on all level. That is why I think it very rash to assume that the story of hte Ascension is mere allegory. I know it sounds like the work of people who imagined an absolute up and down and a local heaven in the sky. But to say this is after all to say 'Assuming that the story is fake, we could thus explain how arose.' Without that assumption we find ourselves 'moving about in worlds unrealized' with no probability----or improbability----to guide us. For if the story is true a being still in some mode, though not our mode, corporeal, withdrew at His own will from the Nature presented by our three dimensions and five senses, not necessarily into the non-sensuous and undimensional, but into, or through, a world or worlds of super-sense and super space. And He might choose to do it gradually. Who on earth knows what the spectators might see? If they say they saw a momentary movement along the vertical plane - then an indistinct mass - then nothing - who is to pronounce this improbable?"

(C. S. Lewis, "Miracles", God in the Dock.)


Thursday, May 04, 2006

珍珠@眼淚

「那天晚上,我寫了我的第一個短篇故事,只花了我三十分鐘。那是個晦暗的小故事,說有個人找到一只魔法杯,知道如果落淚到杯裏,他的淚水就會變成珍珠。雖然他一直很窮,但一向很快樂,很少落淚,所以他想法子讓自己悲傷,才能落淚讓自己變得富有。隨著珍珠不斷累積,他的貪婪之心也越變越大。故事的結尾是那人坐在珍珠山頂,手握刀子,無助地落淚到杯裏,他心愛的妻子卻橫屍在他臂彎裏。」

Khaled Hosseini, The Kite Runner.

我是在信報游清源「頭文字Y」的專欄讀到這個故事。作家是美籍阿富汗人,這是他第一本小說。

幸而是故事,可惜卻又很真實,真實得太可怕。


要珍珠,抑或要妻子?